Adam Smith and the Death of David Hume

The Letter to Strahan and Related Texts

Edited by Dennis C. Rasmussen

Paperback - £37.00

Publication date:

15 September 2018

Length of book:

108 pages

Publisher

Lexington Books

Dimensions:

228x164mm
6x9"

ISBN-13: 9781498586108

The Letter to Strahan is an ostensible letter that Adam Smith wrote on the last days, death, and character of his closest friend, the philosopher David Hume, and published alongside Hume’s autobiography, My Own Life, in 1777. Other than his two books, it is the only work that Smith published under his name during his lifetime, and it elicited a great deal of commentary and controversy. Because of Hume’s reputation for impiety, Smith’s portrayal of his friend’s cheerfulness and equanimity during his final days provoked outrage among the devout. Smith later commented that this work “brought upon me ten times more abuse than the very violent attack I had made upon the whole commercial system of Great Britain”—meaning, of course, The Wealth of Nations. This is the first annotated version of this fascinating and important work.

Along with the Letter to Strahan, the volume also includes Hume’s My Own Life, the work to which the Letter was a kind of companion piece; two personal letters related to the Letter; and three published responses to the Letter—two viciously critical and one generally favorable. A substantial editor’s introduction discusses the context, composition, publication, and significance of the Letter, along with the strong reaction that it provoked. Taken together, the works included in the volume provide an entertaining and accessible entrée into some of the most controversial debates over religion and morality in the eighteenth century.

Rasmussen (political science, Tufts), a leading scholar on the relationship of Hume and Smith, here provides a small collection of works related to the death of David Hume. Included are Hume’s brief autobiography and letters from Smith regarding Hume’s life and death—in particular Smith's supposed Letter to Strahan. The collection is particularly interesting first because of the perceived tension between Hume’s atheism and his calm and happy demeanor while facing his death, and second because Smith’s description of Hume’s character was perhaps as controversial as Hume’s life itself, raising questions about the possibility of achieving moral excellence without the guidance of religion. . . this collection will be a useful resource for those researching Hume’s death, or teaching a course on Hume or even the relationship of morality and religion. Additionally, the introduction and editorial comments are invaluable for understanding the historical context of these events and debates.



Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty.