Access to Inequality

Reconsidering Class, Knowledge, and Capital in Higher Education

By (author) Amy E. Stich Institute of Higher Educa

Publication date:

13 September 2012

Length of book:

148 pages

Publisher

Lexington Books

Dimensions:

236x156mm
6x9"

ISBN-13: 9780739169322

Set against the backdrop of democratization, increased opportunity, and access, income-based gaps in college entry, persistence, and graduation continue to grow, underlining a deep contradiction within American higher education. In other words, despite the well-intended, now mature process of democratization, the postsecondary system is still charged with high levels of inequality. In the interest of uncovering the mechanisms through which democratization, as currently conceived, preserves and perpetuates inequality within the system of higher education, this bookreconsiders the role of social class in the production and dissemination of knowledge, the valuation of cultural capital, and the reproduction of social inequalities. Drawing upon the author’s year-long qualitative research study within one “democratized” institution of higher education and its associated art museum, Access to Inequality explores the vestiges of an exclusionary history within higher education and the art world—two related contexts that have arguably failed to adequately respond to the public’s call to democratize.
Stich has a well-defined remit that assists in her analysis of some contemporary practices in parts of North American higher education: she is also a very talented writer. Her title appears a deliberately provocative response to the now-familiar question ‘access to what’? The answer she sets out is a chilling one for liberal-minded educators (amongst whom I often include myself) but perhaps not so surprising for those who try to take a strongly reflexive sociological view of higher education in their research (amongst whom I also include myself). . . .What is even more impressive is her capacity to oscillate back and forth between system-level features and the most ‘micro’ of everyday social processes. . . .I would argue that Access to Inequality already provides powerful justification for more radical action in terms of admissions, perhaps drawing lessons from affirmative action policies.